Personal site / September 2026

Adam Guérin

Adam Guérin.
17.

Builder. Thinker. Doer. Researcher.

I build software and study how intelligent systems make decisions.

Currently building Aurels and researching reliability in AI agents.

Casablanca, Morocco

Selected work

/ Selected work

Three pieces of work. The rest is an archive of experiments and useful detours.

AI Agent Security · 2026 — Present

Aurels

A control layer for autonomous AI agents. Aurels evaluates sensitive actions before execution, applying policy and semantic risk checks before an agent can perform irreversible operations.

  • Live verification console
  • API and rules engine
  • Semantic risk pre-screen
  • Signed, expiring execution permits
  • Audit trail
  • 65+ automated tests
  • GitHub/MCP action-control integrations

EdTech · 2025–2026

Preparly

Co-founded Preparly, a gamified exam-preparation platform, and served as CTO / Product Designer. I worked across product, UX and engineering, from early prototypes to production infrastructure.

Reached approximately 5,000 monthly active users at peak.

Independent research · 2026

Research

Selective Risk Control for LLM Decision Agents under Uncertainty studies whether binding adversarial critique and abstention gating improve decision behavior when evidence is sparse or contradictory.

The result is intentionally narrow: the mechanism acts primarily as a conservative risk gate. It reduces exposure to difficult cases through abstention, but does not consistently improve active-decision performance at matched coverage.

/ A control surface

Aurels is not a model. It is a decision layer around a model’s ability to act.

Aurels execution flow — an explanatory system diagram, not a product screenshot.
Agent proposalTool call or irreversible operation arrives with context.
Policy + semantic riskEvaluate the action. Produce a signed, expiring permit or hold it for review.

/ Research

Research is a way to make the limits visible before systems are asked to do more.

Manuscript under external peer review

Selective Risk Control for LLM Decision Agents under Uncertainty

The work evaluates a controlled sparse-and-contradictory evidence benchmark: five agent architectures are asked to decide, defer, or reject. It tests whether critique changes the quality of decisions—or simply changes when a system refuses to make one.

Main finding: binding critique behaves as a conservative risk gate. It can be useful when false commitment is costly and abstention is acceptable; it is not a universal upgrade to active decision-making.

The paper’s limits matter: the evaluation uses a controlled benchmark and proxy regret, so its empirical result is domain-bound rather than a claim of universal safety.

High-uncertainty coverage V2 benchmark
Monolithic
90.6%
C1 binding
7.7%
acts on high-uncertainty casesbinding critique
Figure 1. One behavioral signature from the experiment: binding critique sharply reduces action coverage in the highest-uncertainty cases. Source: Selective Risk Control for LLM Decision Agents under Uncertainty, V2 results table.

/ Archive / experiments

Things I built to learn from. Not every prototype needs to become a company.

/ Beyond building

Curiosity is more useful when it becomes shared infrastructure.

Community

Momentum

An entrepreneurship initiative and community involving approximately 20 students.

Research community

Research Club

A leadership role in a ~30-student research community, with work around IoT and AI.

Communication

Making systems legible

Technology communication, public speaking and small explanations are part of the practice—not a separate personal brand.

/ Philosophy & method

A few working principles, revised whenever the work proves them wrong.

01

Build to understand

I learn fastest when an idea becomes something people can actually use.

02

Reliability matters after the demo

A system becomes interesting when it leaves the controlled environment and starts making decisions in the real world.

03

Restraint is a feature

In products, research and design, knowing when not to act can matter as much as knowing what to do.

/ Timeline

The through-line is less a career ladder than a sequence of things that taught me what to try next.

2026

Aurels

Co-founded Aurels and began building an independent control layer for sensitive AI-agent actions.

Research

Completed independent research on selective risk control for LLM decision agents. The manuscript entered external peer review at Discover Artificial Intelligence.

Preparly

Transitioned from Preparly after the platform reached approximately 5,000 monthly active users at peak.

2025

Preparly

Co-founded Preparly and built the product as CTO / Product Designer.

Research Club / Momentum

Expanded involvement in research and student entrepreneurship.

Earlier AI research

Worked on explainability and reliability questions in machine learning.

2024

Elystral

Built an early experiment around intentional, non-addictive social software.

EcoTripPlanner

Built an early sustainable-travel product with a student team.

2023 & earlier

Early experiments

Software, design, automation and digital products—mostly a way of finding problems worth staying with.

Early experiences

Earlier short-form work across UX/UI, marketing, branding, automation, frontend development and video editing helped build range. It is kept here as context, not as the main story.

Outside the terminal

Long-distance running and triathlon training; reading about technology, economics and systems; design; and building unnecessary side projects because I am curious.